RETURN to PartyPolitics.org Home

Party Law

How nations regulate political parties and party members

Monograph
   

2005

Adopting Party Law, one in the series on Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives (Washington, DC: NDI, 2005).
Reviews over 1,000 national/constitutional laws concerning political parties in 169 polities across the world. Reprinted in John Hardin Young (ed.), International Election Principles: Democracy and the Rule of Law (Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation, 2009), pp. 81-134.
 
 
Articles and Book Chapters

2011

"Party Law," in The Encyclopedia of Political Science, Volume 4, (Washington, DC: CQPress, 2011), 1190-1191.
Party law refers to governmental regulations concerning the organization, operation, and activities of a nation's political parties and to internal rules formulated by individual political parties to govern themselves.
 

2008

"Assessing Laws That Ban Party Switching, Defecting or Floor-Crossing in National Parliaments," in Democracy Unit, Terugroeprect (Recall) (Parimaribo, Suriname: University of Suriname, 2008), pp. 83-113.
Studies changes in parliamentary members' party affiliations in nations across the world. It examines the extent of party change; how this phenomenon has been studied; why some scholars favor banning parliamentary party switching; why politicians have legislated against party defections; the extent of such legislation; and the consequences of such bans for political parties' and party systems.
 
Papers and Addresses

2009

"Laws Against Party Switching, Defecting or Floor-Crossing in National Parliaments," Paper presented at the 2009 World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Santiago, Chile.
Parliamentary members who switch parties during the session may be expelled from parliament because they violate the law in their country. This paper studies such "anti-defection" laws. It investigates the extent of such legislation; why and how often legislators switch parties; how this phenomenon has been studied; why some scholars favor banning party switching; why politicians have legislated against party defections; and the consequences of such bans for political parties and party systems.

2007

"Assessing Laws That Ban Party Switching, Defecting, or Floor-Crossing in National Parliaments," Paper prepared for the United Nations Development Program Workshop, "Right to Recall: A Right of the Party or of the Electorate?" Hotel Krasnapolsky, Paramaribo, Suriname, August 11, 2007.
This paper studies changes in parliamentary members' party affiliations in nations across the world. It examines the extent of party change; how this phenomenon has been studied; why some scholars favor banning parliamentary party switching; why politicians have legislated against party defections; the extent of such legislation; and the consequences of such bans for political parties and party systems.

2006

"Creating a Cross-National Database of Party Laws," Prepared for delivery at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 22, Chicago, Illinois.
I describe a computer database of 1,101 party laws enacted in 169 nations. The database was created to assess "how nations govern political parties." Each entry in the database is tagged by the law's origin (constitutions, national legislation, court rulings, and so on) and its target: political parties, political groups, elections, campaigns, candidates, voters, or government. I used the database in "Adopting Party Law."
 
"How Nations Govern Political Parties," Prepared for delivery at the 2006 World Congress of the International Political Science Association, July 12, Fukuoka, Japan.
Describes my crossnational survey of over 1,000 government regulations in 169 countries that affect the legal status of parties, their activities, finances, campaigns, candidates, organization, and other aspects of party politics. This inventory of government regulations concerning political parties has been compiled into a database that can be queried to answer questions about the shape and extent of the legal framework under which parties operate.
 
"Measuring National Performance on Models of Party Regulation," Prepared for delivery at the Expert Meeting on Political Party Development in Conflict-prone Societies, Organized by the Clingendael Institute, October 25, 2006; The Hague, Netherlands.
Formulates five models reflecting different ways in which nations have regulated parties through their policies. These models were described as ones of proscription, prescription, permission, promotion, or protection of parties and party activities. The paper has three parts: (1) a description of five models for regulating political parties and the general approach to scoring nations on each model; (2) a data report on the scoring results; and (3) an evaluation of the methodological difficulties in the study.
 
"Six Issues in Regulating Political Parties," Prepared for delivery at the Expert Meeting on Political Party Development in Conflict-prone Societies, Organized by the Clingendael Institute, October 25, 2006; The Hague, Netherlands.
Six key issues in regulating parties that deserve special attention: (1) civil prerequisites of the political system, (2) the legal level of the regulation, (3) the role of political parties in presidential governments, (4) differences between parliamentary and presidential governments in the regulation of political parties, (5) differences between intra-party and inter-party democracy, and (6) the type of produced by the regulations—aggregative or articulative.
 
"Clarifying Concepts in Democracy Assistance: 'Engineering' v. 'Regulating'" Prepared for delivery at the Expert Meeting on Political Party Development in Conflict-prone Societies, Organized by the Clingendael Institute, October 25, 2006; The Hague, Netherlands.
Contends that "engineering" and "regulating" are fundamentally different processes that fit different stages of political development.

2005

"Goldilocks and Party Law: How Much Law Is Just Right?" Prepared for delivery at the American Political Science Association "Short Course" on Political Parties in Emerging Democracies," Washington, DC, August 31, 2005.
How closely should nations regulate political parties? If governments have no laws stating what parties can and cannot do, nations risk ruthless politics with little or no public accountability. If governments enact strict laws specifying how parties should organize, campaign, and operate, nations might discourage or prevent political parties from participating in public affairs. Should parties have free rein to do as they wish? Or should parties be governed by comprehensive laws?

2004

"Role of Law in Political Party Change," Paper prepared for "Change in Political Parties," a Policy Roundtable Sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International development and the Association Liaison Office for University Cooperation in Development, Washington, D.C., October 1, 2004
. Considers electoral law, party law, and party finance) as major aspects of the legal framework for direct regulation; and two other major targets of indirect regulation: campaigns and candidates.
 
Book Reviews

2019

Piero Ignazi,
Party and Democracy: The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017) in Party Politics (2019)