Octavio Amorim Neto and Fabiano Santos,
"The Executive Connection: Presidentially Defined Factions
and Party Discipline in Brazil," Party Politics, 7
(March 2001), 213-234.
First Paragraph:
Recent comparative analyses of democratic assemblies posit a
two-step relationship between electoral strategies and
legislative behavior (Lancaster, 1986; Cain et al., 1987;
Cox, 1987; Mainwaring, 1991; Shugart and Carey, 1992; Ames,
1995; Morgenstern, 1996). The first step relates electoral
institutions to the type of vote cultivated by candidates.
Two types of vote are identified: one personal, the other
partisan. Electoral institutions such as nomination rules,
seat allocation formulas and district magnitude are assumed
to play a key role in determining the prevalent type of vote
in a given polity (Carey and Shugart, 1995). The second step
links type of vote to legislative behavior. Here the key
hypothesis is that the more personal the vote, the more
individualistic the legislator behavior. Conversely, the
more partisan the vote, the more partisan the legislative
behavior.
Figures and
Tables:
Table 1: Distribution of seats per party (%) in the Chamber
of Deputies (1946-63) p. 216
Table 2: Average discipline of the largest parties per
legislature (1946-63) p. 218
Figure 1: Yearly Discipline Rates for the PSD, UDN and PTB
(1946-1963) p. 219
Figure 2: Yearly Discipline Rates for the PR and PSP
(1946-1963) p. 220
Table 3: Party membership of presidential cabinets in Brazil
(1946-64) p. 226
Table 4: Electoral heterogeneity of Brazilian parties after
five election (1946-63) p. 228
Table 5: The determinants of party discipline p.
228
Last Paragraph:
Finally, the role of presidential hopefuls requires further
study. In this article we theorized that they are key actors
in the mobilization of opposition to presidents, and have
incentives to challenge the latter in a radical fashion.
This, in turn, leads presidents to use the bait of patronage
to coopt opposition parties. We need to better understand
which resources presidential aspirants have with which to
fight incumbents and become successful candidates in
patronage-based systems.
|